Sign in or 

| Started By | Thread Subject | Replies | Last Post | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Herska | Ugh. | 6 | Feb 13 2009, 5:06 AM EST by Herska | ||||
|
Thread started: Jan 12 2009, 9:01 AM EST
Watch
First of all, the idea of author reviewing is GREAT. This gives authors constructive feedback on their tracks and helps them figure out what they can do better in their tracks.
But do we really need to classify authors as Legendary authors and just normal, boring authors who no one gives a crap about? Not that I disagree with that authors like Moose_Man and Milkshakeweedwacker are good, but I think giving their reviews an own site just becouse the creator of this page likes their tracks is too much. This is like treating the better authors as gods and just automatically letting everyone that these four guys are the authors you should know about, the others aren't that great (again, I agree that these authors might be the best on the site, but at least let people figure that out and make their opinions by themselves). Boy, this site actually reminds me of the Soviet Union. Some of these reviews don't classify as reviews to me, but more like the Moderators of FRT.com praising each other. For now on, make decent, honest reviews without any additional and unrelated ass-sucking. Herska's awesomeness rating: 0/200. No offense to anyone personally. Peace out.
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
Keyword tags:
Author and Rider
Show Last Reply
|
|||||||